Detailed review Jordan XXXII Low / High

Before the launch of the Jordan XXXII, I thought this was a very worthwhile shoe, especially compared to the over $ 200 price tag of the XX8 to XXX series. After a period of experience (almost 7 months), I feel very satisfied with XXXII or Jordan 32 but still feel something is missing.

I. Design, Material

Since knit came in, this is the first time it has appeared on the Air Jordan line. Above the upper half of XXXII is a soft, thick, bootie-style knit layer.

Wrapped on the sides are two wings from Jordan XII inspired leather. In the low-neck version, this part is quite shortened but still enough to embrace the ankle.

Phylon midsole with Unlocked Zoom extremely large in the nose looks quite “normal” due to not protruding as the previous version. But you can still often see the Zoom through the insole. The base part is also changed to achieve better grip than the XXXI.

Evaluate:

• Right size or up half.
• Flyknit part is hugging, nose is a bit narrow
• The high-heeled version is very tight
• The low-heel version is okay, when playing, it is not loose

The wool body of the shoe feels very thick and firm, but not too stiff. If you prefer a softer knit, Lebron XV, KD X, XI are the more suitable options. Knit the Jordan XXXII in rugged, layered, and seamless.

Overview of fit, the nose of 32 is a bit narrow and horizontal if playing for a long time, I have a similar problem with CP3 XI. With Jordan couples, I always have to be half the size to be most comfortable. The midfoot section is very firm after the tie.

There’s nothing to say about the highs, unless you feel uncomfortable wearing boots. In addition, the fabric in the heel of the low is also softer and more comfortable.

In return, the low-neck version will not bring a solid feeling on the leg, but I also do not see the heel slip.

The high heels and the ruggedness of the knit part make it very reassuring to go low or high.

III. Adhesion

Evaluate:

• Very good grip on most of the pitch
• Need to wipe if you play a dusty wooden floor
• Durability 31

After using Jordan XXXI’s inspired gecko feet to produce a pair of shoes that scream but not sure to stick, XXXII is more solid with stylized herringbone soles. This sole has a pretty good friction and a good pitch.

In terms of durability, the outer rubber layer will still wear off quite a bit if you play a bad cement field (the photo above was taken after taking the Y yard 1 day) but still thick and boring compared to 31. If you only play the Beautiful outdoor field, Jordan 32 will be able to withstand a long time. In addition, not making the base any more protruding also minimizes the Zoom damage of the 28 and 29 series.

If only in terms of grip, maybe XXXII is only better than XXXI in the ability to go dusty, but in return it is very stable in most of the pitch as well as good durability in the Jordan line.

IV. Buffer / Cushioning

Evaluate:

• Zoom nose bounce, thick, smooth
• Thick heel zoom, good damping
• Transition is a bit hard, need break in

Ditching the convex Zoom design makes it difficult to feel the Zoom immediately. But after a while running and jumping, it will be very quiet and clearly see how big this Zoom bag is. Compared to the previous series, the 32 is more gentle than bouncing, but still much better than other shoes on the market. Imagine a piece of inflated tire underneath.

The heels are not Unlocked, but the Zoom top is still the most familiar design ever. Unlike the useless Kyrie 2 to 4 Zoom pad, with the Jordan 32 you can actually see the heels being lifted and pushed up every time they touch the ground.

The Jordan 32’s Phylon 32 is a bit thick but chewy and doesn’t take much break-in time.

V. Support

Evaluate:

• Quite a bronze pot thanks to the heel and synthetic leather frame
• Flyknit thick, hugging helps to hold the foot
• Wide base, flat, wide edge of base

Right from the time I saw the J32’s design, I knew this was a stable shoe, more solid than the old line. I don’t know if it’s inspired by the Jordan 2, but the frame of the 32 is more like traditional shoes with flat soles, high collars. In addition, the base edge and the midsole frame are wrapped up to help your feet stay stable in all situations.

The low version, except without a flat ankle, is completely similar to the high version in terms of certainty due to the very good fit.

The soles of the feet have always been a strong point of the Jordan line with the Flight Speed, now with carbon fiber added. But also so at first you will feel a bit stiff legs.

BECAUSE. Conclusion – Air Jordan XXXII

Pros:

• Material luxury but sure
• Lockdown shoe body is good for both high and low versions
• The nose pad is bouncing, stretched from Zoom
• Stable soles
• Good grip, more durable than the old versions

Cons:

• Need to break-in
• Need break-in
• A bit “stiff” compared to a pair of Jordan

For the best you should be up half the size. Jordan XXXII is suitable for all positions.

Like when I reviewed Rose 5 a few years ago, the Jordan 32 has everything: delicious materials, good grip, good foot pads and extremely solid. It is so solid that it no longer looks as elegant as the previous versions and the legs also feel slightly different from the previous version. That means it is still very good to walk, but the feeling it does not belong to this line of shoes. Rose V was like that, now Jordan 32 is the same.

Still, the Jordan 32 is undoubtedly one of the best value-for-money high-end shoes for me thanks to the luscious materials (Zoom, flyknit, carbon fiber) and very good foot performance once it breaks. -print. Don’t ask why I keep mentioning the break-in because many people have changed from hate to love these shoes after a while.